Source Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=UgxfZATbglczPtrRK314AaABAg
4:02:28 The heck, where is his "blog" anyway? Don't tell me it's Facebook...he's not writing in your own group forum, and the summaries for the videos might be fine, but the way the videos are structured is useless crap, Sutra is abandoned, so no wonder there's no way to send feedback.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=UgxtZIIM9a7hlcWblF94AaABAg
3:57:42 Collin, let me say this with the validity of an outside observer: you didn't listen to what's burried in the GCC's conversation history. It's fine to ignore it and it might be of help for Glenn, but you seem to miss some major points here.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=UgwyOOv2I1hnwsQ7Enp4AaABAg
3:50:38 And you guys still don't see an issue with linear, scarce airtime? You still seem to be confused about value(s), like there would be 1000$ in value generated or invested as time-equivalent? Collin, if you're ready and don't get the airtime, why in the world wouldn't you record your own thing?
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=UgwpQ9inGASjv6BuF6h4AaABAg
3:47:50 And don't forget to fix your own blog posts, just sayin... ;-)
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=Ugyb4k_E42QKEhEf2eB4AaABAg
3:40:29 No, listen carefully: he cares about mapping, so as long as you map, he cares about the mapping you do.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=UgzWszNJULwUxH4VuJZ4AaABAg
3:39:54 Come on, do you really want to discuss on that level?
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=UgzyAzzZjwz9bDMU56R4AaABAg
3:08:52 How can you say that there aren't several options? You're deciding what you do right now for it to become/shape/realize a certain future and not one of the other alternative futures, right? So the only problem with scenarios is that the previous statement is also true for everybody else and the systems that exist, they're heading towards their future of choice/design, and for realizing a certain future on a grand scale, it's hard to impossible to change all the other people and systems to arrive at the desired future, so the direction might seem rather fixed.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=UgwGXkjREQJkELfFG4V4AaABAg
3:25:22 I'm not even on the map, that's some ignoring on Collins side in terms of what I've written/commented and the analysis of the recorded material as source for the mapping.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=Ugwm4MttaMKyCuwapK54AaABAg
3:23:05 Yes, the GCC is very good at ignoring all work that's not live conversations due to the lack of tools that help with it, and you don't plan/intend to build such despite constantly claiming that you do.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=UgxWeYcoGH-sqQdw-CF4AaABAg
2:35:45 Navigating between the two, whatever, it's just not very helpful if you're unable to see it from an outsiders perspective, and if you want to include all the perspectives of all the participants and non-participants, good luck with ever arriving anywhere.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=UgxKnb8kLi6Nzl0C-zt4AaABAg
1:30:30 Men tend to think in terms of things/objects, so women have to learn how to feel/be in terms of things/objects while men have to learn how to think in terms of feelings/beings. What's surprising about it? Only for those who believe that there are no differences between men and women.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=Ugy3KBNEX18fo59b1w94AaABAg
1:18:45 No, Heiner, semantic annotation works for any media, and WE DON'T EVEN HAVE THE SEMANTIC WEB, so how can you complain that it is insufficient? Nothing of what you do on your own site nor anything that the GCC does is semantic, to the contrary! Just in case you haven't heard it yet, it's restrictively, proprietary copyrighted by default, by law.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=UgyOdEUnC63xOOGEhA14AaABAg
1:07:05 and 1:09:58 That's from Tammy who puts forward value(s) and the identity wallet. Basically, the creations/contributions by the others are all not usable by default.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=Ugy_uFxGs0kQ8RcCTrl4AaABAg
44:00 He certainly didn't bother to mess up computers and software completely, that's something to fix!
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLHp03SOHcg&lc=UgyRz-uvH6NHetbMk-d4AaABAg
4:02:42 Collin, that's your fault. You made the map the way it is.