Source Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uldxGh5B7o
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uldxGh5B7o&lc=UgzHGtUKdLmurMcD-mp4AaABAg
2:32:54 No "AI" required for that, except maybe for dealing with the unbelievable crap our websites are made of today, so nothing other than a rather intelligent bot/agent can access the data we buried in there.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uldxGh5B7o&lc=UgxBEZBaX4mG2P_gjfx4AaABAg
2:52:30 Another incredibly stupid decision by Google: why would the glasses EVER need a video camera? That's only because they're a search engine company and believe in the "AI" hype religion and image recognition, as if there couldn't be AR without actually identifying all the objects VISUALLY, one of the hardest things to do and potentially impossible to do. Now hopefully others produce me some nice AR glasses just lacking the cam, and it'll be perfect.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uldxGh5B7o&lc=Ugy-WnGxpic6JGulp-B4AaABAg
2:49:23 As beautifully demonstrated, the "AI" turns out to have no "intelligence" whatsoever, with Jaron Lanier it's the intelligence of many, many humans who entered the data. The damn thing obviously doesn't understand anything at all, for deep, fundamental reasons. It's a potentially "good-enough" "intelligence"-simulation/illusion.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uldxGh5B7o&lc=Ugwou1X9bz_xxiPSRLF4AaABAg
2:43:05 That's only because you don't know much about Engelbart's vision. His standard reply was: just try to ski down a slope with voice commands...voice is in no way the right tool for every task, opposed to the notion of "AI" or the use of the wrong tools.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uldxGh5B7o&lc=UgwNBI5Oz20rj8PyqjN4AaABAg
2:55:20 Having the Google "AI" play something from the YouTube library, record it in a video conversation and upload it back onto YouTube, just to get Content-ID striked. Great!
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uldxGh5B7o&lc=Ugy60zu8tGlKv2NzQtV4AaABAg
2:26:36 "Open Source" is a very vague term here. It's fine if they libre-license the tools, but what if the actual intelligence is in the (human) data, not in the software? Then, you don't have the data, do you? So what do the tools help if the data is still not "open" and available, so you become dependent (that's unopen) on a Google service?