Source Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=Ugzj28aZ85GaTIqtAJB4AaABAg
27:28 Unlisted is public. I found them, I have their links, I can spread the links, if I downloaded a copy (which happens automatically, otherwise I wouldn't be able to watch them of course), you have no effective control over where I'm re-publishing them, except copyright, under which you have to sue me, and that's not even possible because they're already under Creative Commons BY 3.0, so the only thing that could work is to say that you yourself infringed the copyright by Josh (in this example), so you weren't legally allowed to pass such rights to me downstream, and then Josh factually isn't suing you, but me, so only I end up stopped from further distribution, if you can catch me and if I'm not successful in distributing it in ways you would have a hard time stopping it.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=Ugx5_T34IEh91vD8Pyt4AaABAg
26:32 Josh, are you aware that this very recording is already under Creative Commons BY 3.0, while I'm not aware that you gave Tammy permission to publish it under that license, so if I'm going to use this very recording (by the way, without copyleft/ShareAlike-clause, my derived work is allowed by you guys to be proprietary), I'm probably running into some legal risk because I can't be sure if rights were cleared, and if I can pass them downstream to my users/viewers who find it on my channel or on my site or podcast channel. Furthermore, you copied text I've written from Sutra onto Facebook, which probably wasn't a citation, but the whole message and doesn't come with the reference to the source, so that would be a copyright infringement as well, but with all the stupid copyright stuff in the digital age, we wouldn't be able to do anything, so please figure out a solution for that, I'm not aware of anything better than libre-free licensing.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=UgymbVIMQdKLHNvrg3x4AaABAg
26:09 Why, for what? You mean "Soft-DRM" or a visual watermark (because what about the transcript and audio then)?
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=UgzkmTGqrVnLsxlPk6B4AaABAg
25:22 I have no clue how something on a Google Drive can have views, and why stupid Google/YouTube wouldn't be able to transfer data between accounts of their own services, and why they wouldn't be able to transfer between Drive and YouTube with or without keeping stats, maybe some major unneeded, unnecessary hurdles are to be encountered there, because it's all crap.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=Ugyu9hpnIvQZN-MXR014AaABAg
24:33 So the material is not only legally trapped, but also technically (as usual). Nothing learned, plenty of lifetime to waste for nothing if it is done manually or if automation software needs to be written against the resistance of the applications and platforms, just because it wasn't done decently to begin with. Then why talk at all, if all it can do is only modify our brains, but nothing beyond that, with all the downsides the human memory suffers from?
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=UgyNSsWMWM_-It3aIvR4AaABAg
23:46 The mere act of recording doesn't necessarily grant any copyright permissions to upload the recording somewhere, except it's considered to be a combined work, a composition of its own, where the creative human expression is somehow in the arrangement of how the video or voice was constructed, but that's a quite vague potential, not something I would rely on.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=UgwcUDTiyupvgnrPWJp4AaABAg
22:46 You can also ask people for permission later, and beep out or cut out who's not happy with his statements being published.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=UgyOjMybU8aBdpIynG94AaABAg
21:59 That sounds pretty scary. Are you aware that this doesn't have anything to do with copyright, but personal rights? Don't know if the US have them, maybe that's why.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=UgzYCHuvFDrsxSvlvpF4AaABAg
21:12 1. I don't think that Doug is a copyright lawyer. 2. Never ask a copyright lawyer about legal copyright advice, they're certainly "not neutral" there. 3. I think you can't transfer copyright to somebody else without asking every participant for permission, which is exactly the issue if you didn't get that right from the beginning. The recordings are legally trapped. 4. There are several Creative Commons licenses -- which one? Not all of them are libre-free. 5. Who knows if all call participants granted/waived all rights to the person who happened to record and upload them. I think you might have only the permission to upload it to YouTube (implicitly, not even written down or to prove that this is actually what has been agreed upon in case you get into some trouble later), but I doubt that this includes a permit to upload the audio to a podcast site, for example. 6. Indeed I want to use the material for my own private purposes, what else would you ever do with it? Except you're referring to the copyleft (ShareAlike clause of the Creative Commons licenses, but that's not supported by YouTube, you need to somehow else indicate that you want ShareAlike) which makes sure that community common shared "property" can't be turned into proprietary, so somebody would gain all the benefit from your work but wouldn't be required to play nicely and contribute back in return. If that's not in place, you can hardly call it a community (with some exploiting parties or what?).
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=UgxBoov0PLvIwvOgCT94AaABAg
18:05 Also manually?
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=UgwqA34KwRp4Y7GeBqh4AaABAg
17:34 I'm thinking about downloading Tammy's uploads and extract the audio, so I can work on it myself independently (including reposting in a TimeBrowser thingy).
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=Ugy0Yty1Rp5D1Zf7Mt14AaABAg
16:51 Manually? ;-)
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=UgzN_GcfEZaX_FXHxxZ4AaABAg
14:28 I didn't have access, but it's leaked by now, so things can be done to/with the original where Sam does the actual up-to-date bookkeeping/curation.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=UgyguUCTkcdmHzXmUwJ4AaABAg
10:39 On the bottom, it says: "Create New Topic in 'General Discussions'". Maybe "discussion" is a general structuring thing and "topic" a single thread/conversation/whatever, but these things always have different names everywhere, so why bother and just create topics until they get too much to require further structuring into larger collections?
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=UgzlywvmgKJcGwjlbLZ4AaABAg
7:19 What will end up there is what you do under Activity -> General Discussions.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAs8k_6xW90&lc=UgyRyEtXsvmZmVYjYJR4AaABAg
27:49 Why do you even need it? On the one hand, yes, on the other hand, no, not necessarily. Why, what do you want to get from it?