1:43 Bots are not that smart, why should the question if it is a bot or real human be important? Do you or the GCC or the triads or humanity have a problem with it? And imagine, just theoretically (we might never arrive there): what if the machine tells you the solution to any and all of your problems?
2:28 It also has disadvantages, for example, you mistaking voice or body language as dishonesty. Or the endless rambling because producing voice is cheap and easy. Or the increased storage and transmission costs. Or the lack of searchability. And so on.
2:58 As if there ever was put a reference to the evidence into voice. You guys don't do that, and in fact, it's very, very difficult. If you want to "link" with voice to something that is written, you get a media break, and you don't have controls to reference something else in voice from voice, except with rough approximations, and citations from failing memory.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i60UZAFxG5I&lc=UgzJwG4f4gvplvTswOd4AaABAg
1:43 Bots are not that smart, why should the question if it is a bot or real human be important? Do you or the GCC or the triads or humanity have a problem with it? And imagine, just theoretically (we might never arrive there): what if the machine tells you the solution to any and all of your problems? 2:28 It also has disadvantages, for example, you mistaking voice or body language as dishonesty. Or the endless rambling because producing voice is cheap and easy. Or the increased storage and transmission costs. Or the lack of searchability. And so on. 2:58 As if there ever was put a reference to the evidence into voice. You guys don't do that, and in fact, it's very, very difficult. If you want to "link" with voice to something that is written, you get a media break, and you don't have controls to reference something else in voice from voice, except with rough approximations, and citations from failing memory.