Source Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmXLFpFSc3I
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmXLFpFSc3I&lc=UgyM3VVp8mBWhx2Hme94AaABAg
1:57:32 That's not a flaw, that's by design. The idea is that also the majority suffers the consequences if they don't care enough to vote for good.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmXLFpFSc3I&lc=Ugzagh556iz5S6z7lwN4AaABAg
1:20:50 Also, you can't find a single word that has no meaning, so language indeed is a tool to convey some meaning, albeit not precise (what can ever be precise when it's up to the interpretation of the receiver/observer?).
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmXLFpFSc3I&lc=Ugy63Hvas71njMp22C14AaABAg
2:10:54 That's the problem, they've gambled away their trust earlier, so nobody trusts them that they want to do good after they've crushed everybody in their way before, they can't repair it or pay off their remorse, the world would be better off if they wouldn't have exploited all the others in the first place to get where they are now. It's also that they don't undo the harm and damage they've done with their businesses, but engage in a completely separate field to portray them as saints there. They played the game unfairly, and now they're out of it. It's also supposed to discourage all who want to follow in their footsteps, and to encourage those who are good-standing. There's some symbolic capital that's not related to financial capital alone, a thing to recognize and learn for a capitalistic society that only knows about the money part.