Source Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InjWrl9Bt-M
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InjWrl9Bt-M&lc=UgyquMkIlpsY64f_2aJ4AaABAg
2:20:03 If it only were Public Domain (ignoring copyfraud for a sec), but no, it's usually "all rights reserved" or YouTube standard license.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InjWrl9Bt-M&lc=UgwyQoLvk5vY-jmmFbZ4AaABAg
2:18:40 You can do that, but once somebody else has received the data from you, there's nothing preventing the recepient to put out the data on the Internet, and once it's there, you can't "unpublish" it, restrictions/control doesn't apply any more, everybody could get it theoretically and republish it. It's not that there were big battles of the media industry, governments or individuals who wanted to prevent this, but all of them failed every single time.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InjWrl9Bt-M&lc=UgzciQckLiilMg2v07N4AaABAg
2:18:00 That's nonsense for fundamental reasons. Once you've given somebody else access to your data, you can't control in any way how they're giving access to whomever else. They're sovereign, independent, potentially non-cooperating entities on the network.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InjWrl9Bt-M&lc=UgyYF5yEpj8iegwfAVB4AaABAg
2:15:00 Only for people who have never really thought about it. It's the same thing as with the printing press, and before that the traveling evangelists at the market place and in private homes: people are distributed, and no central authority can prevent them from sharing if they really want to. It can be made harder and easier, but there's never an absolute solution, it's impossible to control the many ways how information can be exchanged. Now, what one can do, is to build layers on top of it that filter the stuff voluntarily, as a social process, as it is quite some business for people on the Philippines to filter your social media and you accept their filtering and the laws that sometimes demand the filtering, you could also go by recommendations of friends, family, whatever institution, or receive everything unfiltered, with a never-ending social debate what is seen to be OK and what isn't, who should or shouldn't see what, who decides that stuff and how people keep circumventing whatever measures attempt to restrict it. The point is: you have to learn that it isn't physical, it's immaterial. The old rules of property, ownership, control don't apply, they never have and never will, it's just that with computers and networking, it got faster, cheaper, easier than before. That's all, that's the only thing that happened, and people still fail to finally understand that and develop some media competency.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InjWrl9Bt-M&lc=Ugx8Aca1hjfnSGQHITh4AaABAg
2:08:25 The experience can fool you terribly in many ways, you can't recollect it properly, it can be manipulated easily and you only have your own.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InjWrl9Bt-M&lc=Ugz-Cx7NM2ClOSjA_HF4AaABAg
2:08:00 Without it, how can you have history, do anything in the present and have a future?
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InjWrl9Bt-M&lc=UgzhySualBg1W-SD98Z4AaABAg
1:02:20 What is reality based on if not on facts?
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InjWrl9Bt-M&lc=UgwzRcuMjG-Of6eesuV4AaABAg
1:35:55 What you do is this: CHECK THE SOURCES! And if it's good storytelling, well, then at least the actors in the story didn't do a lot to prevent the story from being tellable (in terms of giving reason for the story to be told).
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InjWrl9Bt-M&lc=UgwSBjOvPnof8fwQJdd4AaABAg
1:33:48 That's definitively going on, and also not to forget that they probably get a lot of good money and people via government support in contrast to the declining journalism everywhere else, and that they have a lot of intelligence on the US from the cold war era while the US has little clue what's going on elsewhere (not only loads of data, but the cultural, philosophical understanding of the context).
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InjWrl9Bt-M&lc=Ugw9bG8ir2R_8BSgupV4AaABAg
1:33:23 As if Al-Jazeera, the BBC, AP or anybody else wouldn't be biased. It's just that we in the West get our western propaganda, so it's good to watch/read the other propaganda as well to gain some perspective and destruct/deconstruct biases in our own and foreign media landscape.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InjWrl9Bt-M&lc=UgwLRJyDWZd1c07mmnl4AaABAg
1:14:09 My simple model is that women are more interested in living creatures and social as they give birth, and men in non-social, dead, technical things.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InjWrl9Bt-M&lc=UgzL5088eJ2IAicIKtt4AaABAg
21:39 Who cares if it is propaganda or not, freedom of the press, there can never be enough or too much, it's only more work in terms of media competency.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InjWrl9Bt-M&lc=UgzoPIOsycX9iTJW8yB4AaABAg
2:26:35 The fact of the matter is and therefore the problem, that scarcity is in effect, that it isn't going away and that we can't do much about it, so there's reason to be fearful and work on solutions, isn't it?