Source Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNITJwQUIQo
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNITJwQUIQo&lc=UgxLNK4EV8PePYCk2m54AaABAg
1:59:16 Creative Commons is a collection of licenses, the majority being non-free, proprietary ones. If you use the Non-Commercial clause, it's non-free. You can't get anywhere if you change rules for commercial use, that's a discrimination against certain endeavors and groups. It's as well industrial, legacy copyright construct, non-digital thinking.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNITJwQUIQo&lc=UgwOimmmWBlpP46WehB4AaABAg
1:47:00 Identity wallet makes a lot of sense and isn't too difficult, we could start to build that right now, but it doesn't translate into ownership at all, and compensation not necessarily.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNITJwQUIQo&lc=Ugyr3Mxj6A37HPumgEx4AaABAg
2:02:17 No, it's not that there's time to build a bridge or a need for it, the computers and the network are already here. It is very true that the compensation for value creation now resides at the production, not with the created digital artifact any more. If you don't want to do the value exchange/compensation at the point of production (2:03:42), you're in the game of having people compensate either as voluntarily support, for convenience or by the use of draconian force. That's the laws of immaterial, non-scarce, abundant goods. Not to even enter fundamental value/money/economics philosophy, consideration of the realities.