Source Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtZ2NDwdz5M
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtZ2NDwdz5M&lc=UgyFCOx39w--VovlBRh4AaABAg
1:04:54 Not a difference in that respect, but a difference towards un-scientific approaches, so it's a label or certification that scientific methods/rules have been applied and therefore it's more trustable than random guessing, and it's offered for independent validation or falsification.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtZ2NDwdz5M&lc=UgxOvg_20VNeeFecyZ54AaABAg
1:00:32 Symptomatic that the distinction is unknown or needs to be explained. Why are you guys even discussing science as if you know what it is?
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtZ2NDwdz5M&lc=UgzB9hM9qWE4XCi_BD14AaABAg
58:02 Come on, the interpretations can be called un-scientific, and one has to ask who gets the kicks, and if you're buying into it, if you believe it or not. 58:44 Reproducible phenomena have little to do with perception.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtZ2NDwdz5M&lc=Ugwnm-UPsYYGbtT7W3V4AaABAg
29:16 And you can't. That's the whole trouble, no not-liking-it or being in the conversation can change that. That's the main point. So it will continue, no matter what, so there's no point in claiming that it won't in the future.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtZ2NDwdz5M&lc=Ugz3gKuIMnvS9Sxsm2p4AaABAg
30:30 No, they're on the recording, why are they needed again? To be now answered/pondered on where they weren't in the first place, instead of continuing with the conversation (to get away the current path or what?)?
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtZ2NDwdz5M&lc=Ugw4k2ZRHB5glw5dEip4AaABAg
26:50 No, you don't. You don't reduce your lifestyle, nor do you have any control over the lifestyles of all the others, so reality will need to be faced as it develops with no major shift in direction in sight anywhere. If you refuse to analyze the problems, you can never arrive at a solution or avoid making them again.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtZ2NDwdz5M&lc=Ugy1_-DQgdc1zHM3Pid4AaABAg
25:14 War is a specifically male thing, and while they're mostly caused by men, the men who are fighting them are usually not too happy to be in them. For men there's always a chance that they have to become soldiers, women usually don't have to think much about it (except they become the victims if they're not on the side of the aggressor or stuck in between the battlefield).
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtZ2NDwdz5M&lc=UgwZ1Qnucdbt47kg3D14AaABAg
21:52 Maybe it was a mistake to put the "global" in the name, to think about scaling to a global scope.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtZ2NDwdz5M&lc=Ugw8CaRg0IrfIs-mZVp4AaABAg
15:28 Did somebody ever claim that there's a difference in the humanness between the genders? I don't think so, I can't imagine it, I've never heard about it, I think the gender discussion is all about denying the biological and practical functions, and what follows from that. It's not that law or traditions favoring men or women in certain circumstances do that based on the notion that there's a difference in their (degree, type of?) humanity, as if they were two different races or something.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtZ2NDwdz5M&lc=Ugy54Ew_hD850cQLbRZ4AaABAg
12:09 The reality is that today, on average, there are clearly some tendencies, de facto. Might not have to do with their inherent nature, but are a result of the systems that exist, and they're not changing that fast into different directions, and stating that is a mere objective observation.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtZ2NDwdz5M&lc=UgwAt432HTUWXNDOjwx4AaABAg
5:04 Anna just shouts her perspective into the room and talks over and interrupts Jaswinder (as he does as well), while Alex according to protocol requested permission to speak. Tammy is not neutral and sides with Anna in violation of the protocol, but then who knows if the protocol has ever been established or is enforced, so interrupting might be fine as well, potentially with the option to ignore Tammy's meta-comment, to then face some consequences because unwritten rules were ignored or inability to recognize/observe them, as the conversation is run as an emergent "power" struggle between the perspectives over the limited air time resource.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtZ2NDwdz5M&lc=UgxxWVUMPt2zComHeSF4AaABAg
3:49 What about the female intuition, or caring? What about the very thing you think men are lacking and need to learn, as if there were a difference in qualities?