Source Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=UgzvGJbtbggV84qIGh54AaABAg
2:15:56 It's a visualization tool, that's all. While the more the better, I don't experience a lack of those in the world.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=UgystEf8yljpp6pYqD14AaABAg
2:05:57 Anarchy isn't the absence of coherence, it's actually a pretty good governance model you guys apparently don't know about anything.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=Ugzi1iJW-sB3CKMTLsx4AaABAg
2:05:32 Erm...yeah. If that's the 1 year in 1 week, great!
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=Ugw-r2eKvGHz7Pf-9EN4AaABAg
1:55:21 Yes, sure, those are different summaries. The one is what you thought the conversation was about at the time of the meeting, while a later review summary might reflect more what the conversation was really about, also listening more carefully to the other attendees and points that were missed in the action of the moment. Now you can choose which one is more important to you, or both, or none, or if it is an organizational measure to force people to actually do it, which they wouldn't do in their own time with the recording.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=UgxG-CMF-jyaFtwaWk14AaABAg
1:54:02 Hmm...better than nothing, could be much worse. I guess there's also some Markdown in there. It's not very nice for a software developer, because you have to write your own custom parser for it instead of using some readily-available tooling as for XML, for instance. In fact, the export is not even tabular CSV data, it instead reflects hierarchical depth with the tab character. Minor issues that could be much worse, but also better, so one could work with it if one really had or wants to.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=UgxxJCvQmA0QNPWX6pZ4AaABAg
1:43:42 Embedding is barely interoperating/working-together. Don't worry, you'll learn that the hard way ;-)
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=UgwvpqcUxMJ-35bbFEV4AaABAg
1:21:42 Glenn, why do you need to have one person in that function anyway? Being distracted and not participating? If there's a recording, you can do that afterwards with all the time in the world, so why do you people of the phone always have this obsession with live real-time?
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=Ugw_6EVyXMBhTwTfV6Z4AaABAg
1:04:00 Who created the .com, .org, .net, .info, do you think you can just walk up and claim it and start to use it?
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=Ugzl_6rT-nA6Zx_mQMh4AaABAg
1:03:46 I'm not sure if you can become a TLD registrar that easily, and while it surely got much easier, then you would end up in a whole kind of other business I assume...
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=UgwB6Y7EtwRxt8JKKzt4AaABAg
1:03:16 Wait, what? Books survived hundreds of years, and longer. How long will this data in some webserver using some fragile libraries last? Is that even a concern for the GCC? If so, print/plot it!
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=UgzinYhNAyF-cWYz-el4AaABAg
57:00 Just a small side note: might be that Tammy wants those profiles towards an identity (wallet), but please note that you're again doing it visually (WYSIWYG), not as data and semantically (WYSIWYM), so the map is basically worthless/useless (other than looking at it).
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=UgxNurjNpSaYhNJpJgp4AaABAg
54:49 Tech Leader.
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=Ugy_zI5k8ZRrBiFEdoF4AaABAg
52:44 Err...what do you plan to do with the comments on YouTube, link em or what?
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=Ugyb_dG4E3f5tVXTW254AaABAg
41:00 I'm a technology/infrastructure/tools provider that wears the secondary hat of curator/knowledge-worker and a third hat of critical observer/commentator (the latter is less content/topic agnostic, less neutrality).
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=Ugya0IJrjZUleYcjGpJ4AaABAg
40:02 Curator, knowledge worker. Or do you want to be an "agent"/bot?
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=UgyAC7K3vVdWbVdSbV54AaABAg
1:39 Balaclava ;-)
Comment Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHcL4oa2vKk&lc=UgwMxL-CQV-YYFmP0np4AaABAg
2:16:27 Working on it, in secrecy?